Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 2:26:30 GMT -5
Aan enforcement appeal and a request to suspend enforcement. . in the justification of the exception of unconstitutionality it is argued that by conditioning the admissibility of an appeal to execution formulated by a creditor not pursuing his capacity as an intervening creditor it is reached the impossibility of realizing in practice an appeal to execution formulated by such a creditor. . It is also shown that the interpretation of the criticized legal text in the sense that an appeal to enforcement can be filed by a noncompliant creditor only after he intervenes in the enforced execution regarding which the appeal to enforcement is filed makes it impossible to exercise access to justice.
Objections to execution are admissible if they are formulated by Country Email List creditors or other persons interested or injured by execution as established by art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code. . Bucharest District Court The civil section considers that the invoked exception of unconstitutionality is unfounded. The provisions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code do not affect the free access to justice guaranteed by art. of the Constitution. . According to the provisions of art. para. from Law no. the conclusion of the referral was communicated to the presidents of the twoand the Peoples Advocate in order to express their views on the raised exception of unconstitutionality.
The government considers that the invoked exception of unconstitutionality is unfounded. The criticized legal provisions give expression to the constitutional conventional and legal requirements regarding the right to a fair trial within a reasonable optimal and foreseeable period by giving nonpursuing creditors the opportunity to intervene in the ongoing foreclosure procedure in order to capitalize on their under the terms of the law the claim rights established by the debt titleenforcement title and likewise to request through the procedural way.
Objections to execution are admissible if they are formulated by Country Email List creditors or other persons interested or injured by execution as established by art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code. . Bucharest District Court The civil section considers that the invoked exception of unconstitutionality is unfounded. The provisions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code do not affect the free access to justice guaranteed by art. of the Constitution. . According to the provisions of art. para. from Law no. the conclusion of the referral was communicated to the presidents of the twoand the Peoples Advocate in order to express their views on the raised exception of unconstitutionality.
The government considers that the invoked exception of unconstitutionality is unfounded. The criticized legal provisions give expression to the constitutional conventional and legal requirements regarding the right to a fair trial within a reasonable optimal and foreseeable period by giving nonpursuing creditors the opportunity to intervene in the ongoing foreclosure procedure in order to capitalize on their under the terms of the law the claim rights established by the debt titleenforcement title and likewise to request through the procedural way.